In early January of 2017, there was a literal fight for the soul of the progressive movement inside the Democratic Party.

Angry Bernie Sanders supporters were rallying and organizing around the country to heed Bernie's calls: Reform the party by winning local seats.  Run grassroots candidates.  Go out and fight for a seat yourself.

Change occurs starting from the bottom, Bernie proclaimed.

And so not surprisingly - California, ground zero for all things progressive - was being watched closely by both DemEnterers and DemExiters as they held their delegate elections in January. 

Through Facebook posts, tweets, blogs, and several progressive outlets, the message was clear:  If Berniecrats could win the majority of seats in California by beating out establishment Democrats, they could win anywhere.

And so, as elections were being held, energizing news was coming from every corner of California that Berniecrats were winning the majority of seats! 

The DemEnter crowd roared as they embarked upon there own State conventions.  However, no state would go on to claim an appreciable number of seats for the Berniecrats the way California reportedly had. 

But that's okay.  Because, California!  California showed us how we could overtake the establishment! 

The California progressive movement became the paradigm for those aspiring to reform the party, both formally and informally. 

But there's something very devious at play here.  Something that never appeared in any Facebook posts, tweets, blogs, or progressive outlets. 

Berniecrats did not win an appreciable number of seats; they were only able to claim 1/9th of them.

The reason: Berniecrats are unable to win an appreciable number of seats. 

So, it took another Berniecrat (actually a Hillary Clinton voter) running for California DNC Chair and losing to a corporate lobbyist for me to begin exploring this "reform model" that was inspiring all the "possibilities" inside the DemEnter movement. 

What I found was that the California Democratic Party set up a State Central delegate structure that would prevent a progressive majority. 

You heard me right. 

It's the structure.  And it's preventative.  It's like the Democratic version of a Progressive vaccine.  You introduce a little of the deadly organism so that when the time comes, your body can destroy it before you get too "progressively" sick.
 
Let's take a close look at what the Democratic Party designed in order to block a Progressive majority by setting up a complicated and insurmountable pathway:
 
Who is the California Democratic Party? 

-It's 2900 delegates to the Democratic State Central Committee.  And they are exactly who you think they are: the Establishment. 
 
-One third are elected party officials & their inner circle: All California Democratic members of Congress, State-wide officials, State legislatures & State nominees get to be delegates.
 
They even get to appoint 6 people each!
 
-The next third are local Democratic party officials. Each of California's 58 counties has a Democratic County Central Committee.  Each of those county committees makes their own rules to determine who gets to be the delegates that make up the second third.
 
But hold on, because the last third is where the actual democracy part comes in.
 
-California is broken into 80 different assembly districts.  Each of those districts also gets to democratically elect 14 people - 7 men and 7 women. These democratically elected delegates make up the other third.
 
You can see now how important it was for the Democratic establishment to insert their own lobbyist as California DNC Chair.  The whole scam was merely to "appoint", through a faux democratic election, a leader to oversee the minions in this monster system they created - minions designed to keep progressives out of the club. 

And, let me say for the record,  I now understand what our Progressive warriors from decades past meant when they said they tried, and it can't be done.

So what can Berniecrats realistically expect to achieve armed with this knowledge?  And what good will it ultimately do to transform our country, because a lot of blood, sweat, and tears went into winning 1/9th.  

The bottom line: California realistically cannot and should not be the framework of the DemEnter movement. 

Rather, California should exemplify the harsh reality of the level of corruption the Democratic Party has at its disposal to maintain the status quo.

The California "success narrative" only serves to distract Berniecrats in other states from examining their own Democratic state structures and determining that similarly, there is no strategy or path to a progressive majority there either.
 
Because in reality, every state has a Democratic structure that is designed to mobilize and then burn out Progressives.  It's their way of keeping the "enemy" close, and, more importantly, controlled.  
 
Let's be clear:  it doesn't end there.  The same monstrous set up exists within the Democratic Party and their "private club" known as the DNC, where admittedly (in court no less) they "choose their own candidates in a back room while smoking cigars, like the good ole' days".
 
Fittingly for this situation, The Clash asked in their 80's hit song, "Should I Stay Or Should I Go?"
 
And Bill Bianchi, the former head of the Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) in Chicago, a 20-year Progressive warrior from inside the party, and recent DemExiter, is loudly answering that question to anyone who will listen:
 
"As a matter of fact, we have a better chance of winning as a third party than we do of reforming the Democratic Party.  Any investment of time, money, and energy to reform or takeover the party is futile, and we don't have another 10 years for those in this generation of "reformers" to learn this painful lesson."
 
Too bad he doesn't sound as lyrical as The Clash.  It's definitely not as catchy of a message.
 
But, we do owe our fellow Progressives, who choose to fight from inside the party, our deepest gratitude.  Truly, they are the "Navy Seals" of our fight, and by getting close to the belly of the beast, we are collectively learning about the enemy from the incredible intel they are providing.
 
Just don't take too long "in there", because America needs you "out here".

Lenka Perron is a Regional Director of Michigan's Draft Bernie For a People's Party, a new party built around Bernie's revolutionary campaign, endorsed by Dr. Cornell West, Jimmy Dore, H.A.Goodman, Josh Fox, Lee Camp, Tim Black and others, and focused on uniting progressives everywhere to follow Bernie, Tulsi, Nina and other great leaders behind a new party.


Source: www.cadem.org
 
 
 

Comments

  1. I've remained steadfast #DemEnter because #Bernie is committed to going this route. Building a 3rd Party from scratch... that can acctually contend... near impossible in the short run. Reforming the Democratic Party from within seems nearly as challenging. Defeating the repugs... seems easy compared to this struggle.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Overall, you nailed it. But you underestimate the permeability of the dividing line. Not all "insiders" are opposed to change. Hundreds of them voted for Ellis.


    A couple of clarifications on the numbers:

    "They even get to appoint 6 people each!"
    Well, not exactly. US Senators and CA Senators get 6 appointments each. US Representatives and CA Assemblymembers get 5 appointments each. But the Leader of the "Californial congressional delegation" (Nancy Pelosi) gets 30 EXTRA appointments. So do the President Pro Tem of the CA Senate (Kevin De Leon) and the Speaker of the CA Assembly (Anthony Rendon). So it's even worse than you think.

    Also, although only about 2,930 delegates VOTED, there were 3,290 valid delegates who signed up; I don't know how many actually attended the convention (we may never know, plus it varies day to day). And if all those who qualified to be delegates had actually signed up, and all PLEOs had exercised all their allotted appointments, there would have been more than 3,400 in total.

    I presume you got your "2/9" figure by estimating that Berners won 2/3 of the 1/3 of the ADEM seats. I haven't seen any proof that we won any more than 600 out of 1120, or about 53%. This would be about 20% of the total who voted, or no more than 18% of the total who could have gone. To get from there to 50%, Kimberly Ellis drew a LOT of people who were already inside the party, in county committees, state elected offices, and even appointed delegates. These weren't all Berners, but they are all hungry for change from the status quo in the CDP.

    We are everywhere, and we cannot be ignored. When close to half the convention walked out, every elected official in CA was put on notice that their next election depends on us and the progressive voters we represent. They can either listen to us, or ignore us at their peril.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I follow Bernie. Bernie wants to reform the Democratic Party. When Bernie says go 3d party, then Berniecrats will also.
    Go do what you must, but do not use Bernie's name to do it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am an elected delegate to my county Democratic Party (and therefore a delegate to the state party), a Bernie supporter and a progressive. Ellis lost by only 62 votes. About 90 delegate were appointed by the state elected officials, the majority of whom supported Bauman. Those appointees HAD to vote for whomever they were told to vote for. If the super delegates didn't exist, Ellis would have won. She has the overwhelming support of the majority of delegates in the state party.
    Here's the thing about what was written here. We DO have control of who these people are who gets elected to the central committees and the state party. The idea that this situation is hopeless and impossible is just plain false. We've made a tremendous amount of strides in just the two years (or so) years since Bernie first announced his candidacy. And I do think this movement is the key to winning all over the country. I think our message and our values are the ones that will motivate progressives to get out and vote.
    So what can we do?
    1) First and foremost, get involved with the party. Join the GO Team, join the clubs and get to know who has been elected to represent you within the party. Start forming relationships with the committee members who supported Bernie in the primary and ask THEM about the others. Start forming a slate and if you can, put yourself on it to run. Openings on the Central Committee need to be filled. Make sure they get filled by progressives by lobbying your the members in your Assembly District to vote for the person who represents YOUR values.
    2. Run (or support) people to be delegates to the State party. This is called the ADEM elections and happens every even numbered year. If your area hasn't formed a slate of progressives yet, then consider this your draft notice to do so. These elections are public and ANY registered Democrat can run and vote for these positions. It's never too early to start campaigning for the next election (which will happen in January 2019).
    3. Run or support people to be on your local county Central Committee. These elections take place during the presidential primary and unlike the delegate elections (which are a separate event, that people need to make a trip to go vote), these elections are included on the ballot of the primary election. Make sure you know who is whom on that ballot so that you vote for the true progressives.
    4. Get progressives to run for office against the establishment incumbents. If we can get the majority of PLEOs in the state party, we can change the bylaws to get rid of the super delegates. If we do that, the process is more fair and the will of the grassroots supporters would get implemented.
    5. Join and run for office in a Democratic Club in your area. That is the other piece to this puzzle. Each club gets to appoint a member to represent them at their local area of the party. In addition, these clubs get to appoint delegates to vote in the pre-endorsement caucus in January of each election year. We need to make sure that those delegates are progressives who will only endorse the progressive candidates.
    The part of this essay that is absolutely true is the corruption. And while a great many of the problematic people have been ousted during the last campaign cycle, we still have too many on board who are serving solely for their own self-interest and power. They recognize the need to get the progressives on their side and are now calling themselves "progressive" even though they are establishment as hell. In other words, they lie. Candidates for public office are doing this as well people within the party. We need to be diligent about who we are supporting and make sure that none of these charlatans are getting endorsed.
    We are very close to moving this party back to its grassroots heritage. We just need a little more patience and lot more involvement by like minded people.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment